Justification of the Expediency and Parameters of the Anti-Erosion Element in the Working Tool of the Deep Soil Loosener
https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2026-20-1-52-57
EDN: BOVNBW
Abstract
The development of a new working tool for deep soil loosening requires a comprehensive approach to determining its design parameters and operating modes, based on interrelated and harmonized dependencies. The design process must account not only for the geometry of the tool itself but also for the heterogeneous physical and mechanical properties of the soil environment. It is also essential to ensure stable operation and achieve the required quality of work and energy efficiency of the technological process. (Research purpose) The aim of this study is to develop an anti-erosion deep soil loosener capable of bringing soil clods to the surface. (Materials and methods) The newly designed working tool is designed for primary tillage and deep loosening of soil to depths exceeding 25 centimeters, without inverting the soil layer. During anti-erosion treatment, it simultaneously forms molelike channels. A schematic diagram is presented to illustrate the interaction between the working tool and the soil. (Results and discussion) The scientific novelty of the study lies in establishing dependencies that describe the relationship between the tool’s design parameters and its operating modes during its interaction with the soil. These dependencies form the basis for developing an engineering method for calculating the tool, which is implemented in the form of reinforced bars that interact with the soil surface. The study also substantiates the mechanism of soil layer displacement and identifies the potential disruption modes, including the formation of secondary fracture planes that occur during the upward movement of the soil layer. (Conclusions) The parameters and operating modes of the working tool of the new deep soil loosener have been determined. To initiate effective soil descent, the clearance between the bars should not exceed 50 millimeters. For optimal soil clod trajectory, the shape of the bars should follow a first-order brachistochrone curve (a cycloid). The bar length of the working tool ranges from 0 to 0.4 meters, depending on soil conditions and operational requirements.
About the Authors
G. G. Parkhomenko
Agricultural Research Center "Donskoy"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina G. Parkhomenko, Ph.D.(Eng.), leading researcher
Zernograd
S. I. Kambulov
Agricultural Research Center "Donskoy"; Don State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey I. Kambulov, Dr.Sc.(Eng.), associate professor, chief researcher
Zernograd
Rostov-on-Don
N. V. Buzhinsky
Agricultural Research Center "Donskoy"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikita V. Buzhinsky, postgraduate student
Zernograd
References
1. Liskin I.V., Lobachevsky Ya.P., Mironov D.A. et al. Laboratory study results of soil-cutting operating elements. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2018. N12(4). 41-47 (In Russian). DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-2018-12-4-41-47.
2. Kadamov A., Ikromov I.I. Intensity of wind erosion in the upper reaches of the Ishkashim district of GBAO. Zemledelets. 2014. N4. 91-94 (In Russian). EDN: TLINPD.
3. Lachuga Yu.F., Izmaylov A.Yu., Lobachevskiy Ya.P., Mazitov N.K. Soil-cultinating machinery: ways of import substitution. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2017. N2. 37-42. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-2017-2-37-41.
4. Naumova N.S. Degradation processes on agricultural soils. Youth and Science. 2020. N7. 20 (In Russian). EDN: IFNWDU.
5. Okazova Z.P., Berezov T.A. On erosion processes in the territory of the Republic of North Osetia-Alanya. Bulletin of Chechen State Pedagogical University. 2019. Vol. 18. N2(21). 29-32 (In Russian). EDN: IKTFEX.
6. Lobachevskiy Ya.P., Tsench Yu.S., Beylis V.M. Creation and development of systems for machines and technologies for the complex mechanization of technological processes in crop production. History of Science and Engineering. 2019. N12. 46-55 (In Russian). DOI: 10.25791/intstg.12.2019.1081.
7. Stifeev A.I., Nikitina O.V., Lazarev V.I., Zinoviev R.A. Ecology of agricultural lands of the Central Black Earth under conditions of anthropogenic exposure. Vestnik of Kursk State Agricultural Academy named after I.I. Ivanov. 2020. N5. 37-45 (In Russian). EDN: RXOGWU.
8. Shekikhacheva L.Z. Methodological approaches to the assessment of the ecological state of the soil. Izvestiya of Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V.M. Kokov. 2022. N1(35). 23–34 (In Russian). DOI: 10.55196/2411-3492-2022-1-35-23-34.
9. Alahverdiev F.D., Nabiev O.S. Analysis of deflation mechanisms in the North-Western Caspian Sea region by means of indicating methods of protection and optimization soil resources. Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Journal. Natural and Exact Sciences. 2017. Vol. 11. N3. 90-95 (In Russian). EDN: YQXQAX.
10. Borrelli P., Robinson D.A., Fleischer L.R. et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communications. 2013. Vol. 8 (In English). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02142-7.
11. Amundson R., Berhe A.A., Hopmans J.W. et al. Soil and human security in the 21st century. Soil Science. 2015. Vol. 348 (In English). DOI: 10.1126/science.1261071.
12. Boardman J. Soil erosion science: Reflections on the limitations of current approaches. Catena. 2006. Vol. 68. 7386 (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2006.03.007.
13. Keesstra S.D., Bouma J., Wallinga J. et al. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Soil. 2016. Vol. 2. 111-128 (In English). DOI: 10.5194/soil-2-111-2016.
14. Montanarella L., Jon Pennock D., McKenzie N. et al. World's soils are under threat. Soil. 2016. Vol. 2. 79-82 (In English). DOI: 10.5194/soil-2-79-2016.
15. Lugato E., Paustian K., Panagos P. et al. Quantifying the erosion effect on current carbon budget of European agricultural soils at high spatial resolution. Global Change Biology. 2016. Vol. 22. 1976-1984 (In English). DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13198.
16. Panagos P., Borrelli P., Poesen J. et al. The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy. 2015. Vol. 54. 438-447 (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.012.
17. Borrelli P., Paustian K., Panagos P. et al. Effect of good agricultural and environmental conditions on erosion and soil organic carbon balance: a national case study. Land Use Policy. 2016. Vol. 50. 408-421 (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.033.
18. Panagos P., Imeson A., Meusburger K. et al. Soil conservation in Europe: wish or reality? Land Degradation & Development. 2016. Vol. 27. 1547-1551 (In English). DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2538.
19. Parkhomenko S.G., Parkhomenko G.G. Simulation of automatic control systems of tillage units. Tractors and Agricultural Machinery. 2017. N1. 22-31 (In Russian). DOI: 10.17816/0321-4443-66258.
20. Mazitov N.K., Lobachevsky Ya.P., Dmitriev S.Yu. et al. Upgraded technology and equipment for processing soil and crop in extreme conditions. Russian Agricultural Sciences. 2014. N6. 63-67 (In Russian). EDN: SXGEKD.
21. Dorokhov A.S., Sibiryov A.V., Aksenov A.G., Mosyakov M.A. Analytical feasibility study of the automatic control system of tillage depth. Agricultural Engineering. 2021. N3 (103). 19-23. (In Russian). DOI: 10.26897/2687-1149-2021-3-19-23.
Review
For citations:
Parkhomenko G.G., Kambulov S.I., Buzhinsky N.V. Justification of the Expediency and Parameters of the Anti-Erosion Element in the Working Tool of the Deep Soil Loosener. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2026;20(1):52-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2026-20-1-52-57. EDN: BOVNBW
Views:
98
JATS XML
Email this article 