Justification of the Parameters for Arranging New Working Bodies on the Frame of a Steam Cultivator

The paper highlights that existing steam cultivators do not always meet the quality requirements for the technological process of surface tillage, particularly when equipped with sweep shares. The performance of steam cultivator working bodies can be improved through a fundamental redesign involving the complete elimination of sweep shares. (Research purpose) The study aims to determine the optimal arrangement of working bodies on the frame of a steam cultivator. (Materials and methods) The proposed design of the new working element, excluding sweep shares, consists of a shank with a chisel and consecutively mounted left- and right-sided flat cutters. (Results and discussion) The study identified three distinct soil conditions affecting the draft resistance of the steam cultivator’s working element: solid –without loosened soil on the sides; semi-solid – with loosened soil on one side; and free – with loosened soil on both sides. It was established that most efficient arrangement of an even number of working bodies on the cultivator frame is a two-row configuration with adjustable working width. In this arrangement, half of the working bodies operate under solid conditions, one operates under semi-solid conditions, and the rest operate under free conditions, which ensure the lowest draft resistance. (Conclusions) The calculations yielded the following optimal parameters for arrangement of working bodies on the steam cultivator frame: a two-row arrangement with an even number of working bodies; a total of 6 working bodies; a machine working width of 3 meters; a longitudinal spacing between working bodies of 52–54 centimeters ; and a transverse spacing of 48–50 centimeters.

1. Mamkagh A. Effect of soil moisture, tillage speed, depth, ballast weight and, used implement on wheel slippage of the tractor: a review. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research. 2019. N9 (1). 1-7 (In English). DOI: 10.9734/AJAAR/2019/46706.

2. Panagos P., Borrelli P., Poesen J. et al. The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy. 2015. N54. 438-447 (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.012.

3. Chappell A., Webb N. Using albedo to reform wind erosion modelling, mapping and monitoring. Aeolian Research. 2016. N23. 63–78 (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.09.006.

4. Akhalaia B.Kh., Starovoitov S.I., Tsench Yu.S. A combined unit fitted with a versatile working body for surface tillage. Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area. 2020. N8(278). 8-11 (In Russian). DOI: 10.33267/2072-9642-2020-8-8-11.

5. Botta G.F., Antille D.L., Bienvenido F. et al. Energy requirements for alleviation of subsoil compaction and the effect of deep tillage on sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) yield in the western region of Argentina’s rolling pampa. Engineering for Rural Development. 2019. N22. 174-178 (In English). DOI: 10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N216.

6. Helmana D., Lenskya I.M., Bonfilb D.J. Early prediction of wheat grain yield production from root-zone soil water content at heading using Crop RS-Met. Field Crops Research. 2019. N232. 11–23 (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.003.

7. Nakhaei M., Tafreshi A.M., Tafreshi G.M. A new approach in comparison and evaluation of the overall accuracy of six soil-water retention models using statistical benchmarks and fuzzy method. Eurasian Soil Science. 2021. N54 (5). 716–728 (In English). DOI: 10.1134/S1064229321050136.

8. Niu G., Shao L.-T., Sun D.A., Guo X.A simplified directly determination of soil-water retention curve from pore size distribution. Geomechanics and Engineering. 2020. N20 (5). 411-420 (In English). DOI: 10.12989/gae.2020.20.5.411.

9. Lachuga Y., Akhalaya B., Shogenov Y. et al. tillage device of precision pocessing with pulsed blows of compressed air. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS), Springer, Cham. 2023. 510. (In English).

10. Amin M., Khan M.J., Jan M.T. et al. Effect of different tillage practices on soil physical properties under wheat in semi-arid environment. Soil and Environment. 2014. Vol. 33 (1). (In English).

11. Mairghanya M., Yahyaa A., Adamb N.M. et al. Rotary tillage effects on some selected physical properties of fine textured soil in wetland rice cultivation in Malaysia. Soil and Tillage Research. 2019. Vol. 194 (1-2). 1-11 (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2019.104318.

12. Myalo V.V., Myalo O.V., Demchuk E.V. Foundation of the basic parameters of the working bodies of cultivators for continuous tillage. Bulletin of Omsk State Agrarian University. 2019. N2 (34). (In Russian).

13. Wang M., Fu Z.L., Zheng Z.Q. et al. Effect of performance of soil cultivator with different surface textures of shovel wing. Agriculture. 2021. N11. 1039 (In English). DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11111039.

14. Nikonov M., Buneev S., Shubkin S., Klapp A. Mathematical substantiation of the scheme of location of working bodies on the frame of a cultivator. Agro-Industrial Technologies of Central Russia. 2020. N2 (16). 98-103 (In Russian). DOI: 10.24888/2541-7835-2020-16-98-103.

15. Andreev V.L., Dyomshin S.L., Ilyichev V.V. et al. Multifunctional soil-cultivating unit with replaceable working bodies. Bulletin NGIEI. 2018. N11 (90). 87–102 (In Russian). EDN: YQDNRR.

16. Akhalaya B.Kh., Shogenov Yu.Kh., Tsench Ju.S.,3, Kvas S.A. Improved technology for stripe energy resource-saving soil processing. Machinery Technical Service. 2018. Vol. 132. 232-237 (In Russian). EDN: VLSWCQ.

17. Mudarisov S.G., Mudarisov I.I., Lobachevsky Ya.P. et al. Modeling the technological process of tillage. Soil and Tillage Research. 2019. Vol. 190(2). 70-77 (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2018.12.004.