Soil Layer Destruction by Flat-Cutting Working Bodies
https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2025-19-1-61-68
EDN: RFJZYZ
Abstract
The paper emphasizes the importance of considering the dependence of soil tensile resistance on the relative moisture content when using flat-cutting working tools. Additionally; it highlights the dependence of soil tensile resistance on rhombic cross-section blades and the number of cutting planes. This study focuses on examining the effect of the blade sharpening angle on the specific cutting resistance of the fertile soil layer. (Research purpose) To study the soil layer destruction process using flatcutting working bodies. (Materials and methods) A new soil-tillage tool was developed and subjected to preliminary theoretical analysis. The experimental methodology focuses on measuring only the vertical component of the soil layer’s pressure acting on the working tool. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that the side brackets supporting the blade move along pre-designed guides. (Results and discussion) The research novelty lies in establishing relationships that describe the dependence between the parameters and operating modes of the new working body during its interaction with the soil. A method for the engineering calculation of the working body’s interaction with surfaces has been proposed. The findings indicate that; in heavy loam; the lowest resistance is achieved with a tine on the working organ width of 5 centimeters and a length of 7 centimeters when the ratio of the tine width to the distance between the tines is 2-3.5. (Conclusions) It has been established that the tine length should be approximately equal to the distance between the tines. The study also highlights the impact of sharpening on the technical condition of working bodies and the overall productivity of the tool. Analytical data indicate that for blades with a large cutting width; increasing the cutting depth is more effective in reducing specific cutting resistance.
Keywords
About the Authors
S. V. BelousovRussian Federation
Sergey V. Belousov, Ph.D.(Eng.); associate professor
Krasnodar, Zernograd
V. B. Rykov
Russian Federation
Viktor B. Rykov, Dr.Sc.(Eng.); professor; senior researcher
Zernograd, Rostov-on-Don
S. I. Kambulov
Russian Federation
Sergey I. Kambulov, Dr.Sc.(Eng.); associate professor; chief researcher
Zernograd, Rostov-on-Don
B. V. Turovsky
Russian Federation
Boris V. Turovsky, Ph.D.(Eng.); professor
Krasnodar
References
1. Parkhomenko G.G., Podlesny D.S., Kambulov S.I., Bozhko I.V. Comparative analysis of the working bodies of a field cultivator according to qualitative indicators. Taurida Herald of the Agrarian Sciences. 2024. N1(37). 136-148 (In Russian). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10930800.
2. Trubilin E.I., Belousov S.V., Lepshina A.I. Basic soil cultivation with a turnover in the formation of modern working conditions and arrangements for its implementation. Polythematic online scientific journal of Kuban state agrarian university. 2024. N104. 1902-1922 (In Russian). EDN: TFWSLT.
3. Parkhomenko G.G., Kambulov S.I., Pakhomov V.I. Calculation of parameters of the cultivator’s working body based on bionic shaping. Agricultural Cyber-Physical Systems. 2024. 733-1. 1071-1078 (In English). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-37978-9_103.
4. Izmailov A.Yu., Sidorov S.A., Lobachevsky Ya.P. et al. Scientific principles of raising wear resistance in working organs of soil tillage machinery. Vestnik of the Russian Agricultural Sciences. 2012. N3. 5-7 (In Russian). EDN: PATNMP.
5. Izmailov A.Yu., Shogenov Yu.K. Intensive machine technologies and new generation machinery for manufacturing main groups of agricultural produce. Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area. 2017. N7. 2-6 (In Russian). EDN: ZBMMSL.
6. Izmaylov A.Yu., Lobachevsky Ya.P., Sizov O.A. The technological and technique means for recreation and rehabilitation of idle and degraded agricultural lands. Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area. 2010. N2. 12-14 (In Russian). EDN: KZWFSJ.
7. Lachuga Yu.F., Izmaylov A.Yu., Lobachevskiy Ya.P., Mazitov N.K. Soil-cultinating machinery: ways of import substitution. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2017. N2. 37-42 (In Russian). DOI: 10.22314/207375992017.2.3741.
8. Gudkov S.V., Sarimov R.M., Astashev M.E. et al.. Modern physical methods and technologies in agriculture. Physics-Uspekhi (Advances in Physical Sciences). 2024. Vol. 194. N2. 208-226 (In Russian). DOI: 10.3367/UFNr.2023.09.039577.
9. Belousov S.V., Lepshina A.I., Trubilin M.E. Moldboard plow for full inversion tillage. Selskiy Mechanizator. 2015. N3. 6-7 (In Russian). EDN: TUHAJJ.
10. Belousov S.V., Kambulov S.I., Rykov V.B., Turovsky B.V. Kinematics of rotary tillage machines. Proceedings of Lower Volga Agro-University Complex: Science and Higher Education. 2023. N1(69). 509-519 (In Russian). DOI: 10.32786/2071-9485-2023-01-56.
11. Parhomenko G.G., Kambulov S.I., Belousov S.V. Methodology for determining the similarity criteria for the parts of a deep - miner. Proceedings of Lower Volga Agro-University Complex: Science and Higher Education. 2023. N1(69). pp. 556-563 (In Russian). DOI: 10.32786/2071-9485-2023-01-61.
12. Zhalnin A.A., Chatkin M.N., Fedorov S.E. et al. Assessment of the compacting effect of the roller on the soil of a combined cultivator. Bulletin Samara State Agricultural Academy. 2024. N2. 44-51 (In Russian). DOI: 10.55170/1997-3225-2024-9-2-44-51.
13. Lachuga Yu.F., Meskhi B.Ch., Pakhomov V.I. et al. Investigating trititrigia cultivation in a semi-arid zone. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2023. Vol. 17. N3. 34-42 (In Russian). DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-2023-17-3-34-42.
14. Borisenko I., Meznikova M. Strip tillage as an implementation of resource-saving approaches in areas of risky agriculture. E3S Web of Conferences. 2023. Vol. 398. 01023 (In English). DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202339801023.
15. Mudarisov S.G., Lobachevsky Ya.P., Farkhutdinov I.M. et al. Justification of the soil dem-model parameters for predicting the plow body resistance forces during plowing. Journal of Terramechanics. 2023. Vol. 109. 37-44 (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2023.06.001.
16. Parkhomenko G.G., Parkhomenko S.G. Ecologically safe operation of technical facilities in conditions of physical degradation of soil. Machinery Technical Service. 2019. N2(135). 40-46 (In Russian). EDN: WSZBHC.
17. Helman D., Lensky I.M., Bonfil D.J. Early prediction of wheat grain yield production from root-zone soil water content at heading using Crop RS-Met. Field Crops Research. 2019. 232. 11-23 (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.003.
18. Burton G.J., Shend D.S., Cambell C. Bimodal pore size distribution of a high-plasticity compacted clay. Géotechnique Letters. 2014. 4. 2. 88-93 (In English). DOI: 10.1680/geolett.14.00003.
19. Chatkin M.N., Fedorov S.E., Bychkov M.V. et al. Combined cultivators for differentiated tillage in precision farming system. Selskiy Mechanizator. 2022. N12. 2-3 (In Russian). DOI: 10.47336/0131-7393-2022-12-2-3-14.
20. Chatkin M.N., Fedorov S.E., Bychkov M.V., Zhalnin A.A. Experimental study of the working organ of a deep-loader. Selskiy Mechanizator. 2022. N2. 12-14 (In Russian). EDN: FXEUJH.
Review
For citations:
Belousov S.V., Rykov V.B., Kambulov S.I., Turovsky B.V. Soil Layer Destruction by Flat-Cutting Working Bodies. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2025;19(1):61-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2025-19-1-61-68. EDN: RFJZYZ