Comprehensive evaluation of modern combine harvester performance in Southern Russia

Given the diverse range of machines used on farms (including different brands, models, and manufacturers, etc.), the absence of regulatory guidelines often results in violations of optimality and harmony within the equipment fleet. This, in turn, leads to increased costs of finished products. (Research purpose) This study aims to generalize the results from testing grain harvesters in the southern regions of Russia and to provide a comprehensive assessment of their operational efficiency. (Materials and methods) Tests were conducted on economic entities in Southern Russia using a unified, standardized program and methodology according to GOST 28301-2015, GOST 24055-2016, and STO AIST 8.22-2010. A comprehensive assessment of combine harvesters was conducted evaluating operational and technological performance, energy consumption, and economic criteria. (Results and discussion) A technical analysis of 12 models of foreign and domestically-produced combines has revealed key characteristics that influence their productivity and operational quality. These combines exhibit a throughput capacity ranging from 6.7 kilograms per second (Nova S 340) to 13.8 kilograms per second (John Deere S690), and their engine powers vary between 180 and 530 horsepower. The specific engine power per unit of throughput also varies, ranging from 24.0 to 38.4 horsepower. Axial rotary combines are noted for their high productivity and minimal grain loss. They offer benefits such as reduced grain crushing and low levels of impurity in bunker grain. The average fuel consumption of these combines is recorded at 11.2 kilograms per hectare. (Conclusions) In terms of grain loss, grain crushing, purity, and fuel consumption, domestic combines are comparable to their foreign counterparts, and meet standard agrotechnical requirements. It is recommended that domestic designers study the cleaning mechanisms of the Laverda combine, which ensure minimizing the impurity levels in bunker grain. The cost of the combines analysed does not correlate proportionally with their increased productivity, leading to a signifi cant (up to 40%) rise in the cost of harvesting operations. The Don-1500B combine harvester shows superior economic performance, including direct and capital costs, compared to its counterparts. Therefore, discontinuing its production would be premature.

1. Izmailov A.Yu., Lobachevsky Ya.P. System of machines and technologies for comprehensive mechanization and automation of agricultural production until 2020. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2013. N6. 6-10 (In Russian). EDN: RVTBHJ.

2. Lomakin S.G., Berdyshev V.E. Assessing technical performance level of Russian ROSTSELMASH combines. Vestnik of Moscow Goryachkin State Agroengineering University. 2018. N6. 34-42 (In Russian). DOI: 10.26897/1728-7936-2017-6-34-42.

3. Fedorova O.A., Poddubny O.I. Analysis of the combine harvester fleet in the Volgograd region. Izvestia of the Lower Volga Agro-University Complex. 2018. N1 (49). 298-303 (In Russian). DOI: 10.32786/2071-9485-2018-01-298-303.

4. Zhalnin E.V., Tsench Yu.S., P’yanov V.S. Analysis method of combine harvesters technical level by functional and structural parameters. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2018. Vol. 12. N2. 4-8 (In Russian). DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-2018-12-2-4-8.

5. Zhalnin E.V., Astafyev V.L., Chaplygin M.E. Analytical criteria for evaluation of engineering level of grain harvesters. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research. 2020. Vol. 8. N9. 6546-6552 (In English). DOI: 10.30534/ijeter/2020/260892020.

6. Ryadnov A.I., Tronev S.V., Skvortsov I.P. Theoretical assessment of combine harvester working parts throughput. Izvestia of the Lower Volga Agro-University Complex. 2014. N2 (34). С. 189-194 (In Russian). EDN: SFFKZV.

7. Zhalnin E.V., Chaplygin M.E. Improving the design of combine harvesters by harmonizing their basic technical parameters. Engineering Technologies and Systems. 2023. N33(3). 403-416 (In English). DOI: 10.15507/2658-4123.033.202303.403-416.

8. Tronev S.V., Ovchinnikov A.S., Ryadnov A.I. et al. Application of a structural-topological model in the optimization of the working elements of a combine harvester. IOP: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019. С. 012121 (In English). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/341/1/012121.

9. Berdyshev V.E. Optimization of design and technological parameters for an axial-rotor threshing-separating system. Vestnik of Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2012. N3 (19). 114-117 (In Russian).

10. Berdyshev V.E. Optimization of design and technological parameters for the ‘classical’ threshing-separating system in grain harvesters. Izvestia of the Lower Volga Agro-University Complex. 2012. N3 (27). 175-178 (In Russian).

11. Chaplygin M.E., Zhalnin E.V. Determining the Performance Quality of Combine Harvesters Operating. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2019. Vol. 13. N4. 71-76 (In Russian). DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-2019-13-4-71-76.

12. Benaseer S., Masilamani P., Albert V.A. et al. Impact of harvesting and threshing methods on seed quality – A review. Agricultural Reviews. 2018. Vol. 39. 183-192 (In English).

13. Fu J., Chen Z., Han L., Ren L. Review of grain threshing theory and technology. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 2018. Vol. 11. N3. 12-20 (In English). DOI: 10.25165/IJABE.V11I3.3432.

14. Pakhomov V.I., Braginets S.V., Rudoi D.V., Bakhchevnikov O.N. Pneumatic threshing device. Machinery and Equip ment for Rural Area. 2023. N6. 28-30 (In Russian). DOI: 10.33267/2072-9642-2023-6-28-30.

15. Orobinsky V.I., Vorokhobin A.V., Kornev A.S. et al. Fraction composition of the grain heap and its influence on the level of grain damage and sowing qualities of seeds. Vestnik of Voronezh State Agrarian University. 2021. Vol. 14. N3. 12-17 (In Russian). DOI: 10.53914/issn2071-2243_2021_3_12.

16. Chaplygin M.E., Davydova S.A., Podzorov A.V. Modern requirements for the technical level of combine harvesters. Machinery Technical Service. 2020. Vol. 58. N4(140). 29-39 (In Russian). DOI: 10.22314/2618-8287-2020-58-4- 29-39.

17. Lomakin S.G., Berdyshev V.E. Formation of combine harvesters fleet with account of harvesting conditions. Vestnik of Moscow Goryachkin State Agroengineering University. 2016. N5. 7-12 (In Russian).

18. Godzhaev Z.A., Shevtsov V.G., Lavrov A.V. et al. Stra tegy of Russian agricultural machinery modernization until 2030 (forecast). Machinery Technical Service. 2019. N4(137). 220-229 (In Russian). EDN: DMOGNR.