Preview

Agricultural Machinery and Technologies

Advanced search

Structural and Functional Models for Building New Generation Automated and Robotic Dairy Farms

https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2022-16-1-4-9

Abstract

The authors showed that large dairy complexes for over 2,000 cows create an increased environmental burden on the environment. The main tasks arising in this case were named: creating an optimal indoor microclimate for different age and gender groups of animals; providing sparing and comfortable modes of technological, veterinary and sanitary care and keeping animals; waste recycling; increasing the productive longevity of cows up to 4-5 lactations. (Research purpose) To develop methodologies for modular construction of an expanded standard-size range of new generation automated and robotic livestock farms. (Materials and methods) The authors proposed the main criteria and indicators for building a "smart" farm: minimum feed costs per unit of production; reduced energy consumption; optimal capital intensity of equipment and engineering structures per one livestock place; the minimum cost per unit of production with its high quality. The authors received the criterion equation for the total functional of the dairy farm. (Results and discussion) The authors analyzed the structural and functional diagrams of various configuration and size dairy farms (T-H-shaped), including combined storage farms, which make it possible to create a combined functional and logistics infrastructure consisting of standard modular units. The authors proposed the concept of building a technological module for a "smart" robotic farm for 400 heads with combined sectional feed and waste storage facilities, a robotic milking parlor, a multifunctional electrified robotic feed loader-pusher-dispenser and equipment for microclimate differentiated provision.  (Conclusions) The authors developed methods, models, structural and functional schemes for modular construction of new generation automated and robotic dairy farms of various shapes and sizes. Their following advantages were confirmed: the optimal construction time, a sparing effect on biological objects and the environment, an increase in the production digitalization and automation level, the animal productive longevity, the dairy farming profitability in general.

About the Author

V. V. Kirsanov
Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Kirsanov, Dr.Sc.(Eng.), chief researcher

Moscow



References

1. Izmaylov A.Yu., Tsoy Yu.A., Kirsanov V.V. Tekhnologicheskie osnovy algoritmizatsii i tsifrovogo upravleniya protsessami molochnykh ferm: Monografiya [Algorithmization of technological foundations and digital control of dairy farm processes: Monograph]. Moscow: INFRA. 2019. 208 (In Russian).

2. Popov V.D., Erokhin M.N., Bryukhanov A.Yu., Vasil`ev E.V., Shalavina E.V. Perspektivy sozdaniya ekologicheskikh tsentrov promyshlennoy pererabotki organicheskikh otkhodov zhivotnovodstva [ Prospects of establishing ecological centers for industrial processing of organic animal waste]. Agroinzheneriya. 2020. N3(97). 4-11 (In Russian).

3. Stojkov J., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Duffield T. Fitness for transport of cull dairy cows at livestock markets. Journal of Dairy Science. 2020. Vol. 103. N3. 2650-2661 (In English)

4. Chernoivanov V., Katkov A., Gabitov I., Yukhin G., Martynov V., Khasanov E., Mudarisov S., Baltikov D., Khammatov R., Kovalev P. Technical equipment of farms for comfortable cow keeping in winter conditions. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2019. Vol. 25. N2. 45-53 (In English)

5. Erokhin M.N., Kirsanov V.V., Tsoy Yu.A., Kazantsev S.P. Strukturno-tekhnologicheskoe modelirovanie protsessov i funk­tsional`nykh sistem v molochnom skotovodstve [Structural and technological modeling of processes and functional systems in dairy farming]. Nauchnye trudy GNU VNIIMZh Rosselkhoza­kademii. 2007. Vol. 17. N1. 19-31 (In Russian)

6. Novikov N.N., Kol`chik I.E. Sovremennoe oborudovanie i tekhnicheskie sredstva obespecheniya mikroklimata na zhivotnovodcheskikh fermakh [The modern equipment and technical means of microclimate on livestock farms providing]. Tekhnika i tekhnologii v zhivotnovodstve. 2020. N1(37). 81-88 (In Russian)

7. Kupreenko A.I., Isaev Kh.M., Mikhaylichenko S.M. Tekhnologicheskaya liniya prigotovleniya i razdachi kormosmesey na baze avtomaticheskogo kormovogo vagona [Technological line for preparation and distribution of feed mixtures based on an automatic feed car]. Sel`skiy mekhanizator. 2020. N1. 14-15 (In Russian).

8. Tikhomirov D., Izmailov A., Lobachevsky Ya., Tikhomirov A. Energy consumption optimization in agriculture and development perspectives. International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering. 2020. Vol. 9. N4. 1-19 (In English).

9. Kilcawley K.N., Faulkner H., Clarke H.J., O’Sullivan M.G., Kerry J.P. Factors influencing the flavour of bovine milk and cheese from grass based versus non-grass based milk production systems. Foods. 2018. N7(3). E37 (In English).

10. McDermoot A., Visentin G., McParland S., Berry D.P., Fenelon M.A., De Marchi M. Effectiveness of midinfrared spectroscopy to predict the color of bovine milk and the relationship between milk color and traditional milk quality traits. Journal of Dairy Science. 2016. N99(5). 3267-3273 (In English).

11. Ivanov Yu.A., Skorkin V.K., Aksenova V.P. Optimizatsiya i modernizatsiya tekhnologicheskikh protsessov molochnykh ferm [Optimization and modernization of dairy farms’ technological processes]. Mezhdunarodnyy tekhniko-ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2020. N4. 7-15 (In Russian).

12. Popechitelev E.P. Problemy sinteza biotekhnicheskikh sistem. Nauchnoe obozrenie [Synthesis problem biotechnical systems]. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2016. N2. 54-62 (In Russian).

13. Chernoivanov V.I. Biomashsistemy: vozniknovenie, razvitie i perspektivy [Biomach systems: emergence, development and prospects]. Biomashsistemy. 2017. Vol. 1. N1. 7-58 (In Russian).

14. Durmaz U., Ozdemir M., Pehlivan H. An experimental investigation into heat transfer in milk cooling vessels. Scientia Iranica B. 2018. N25(3). 1258-1265 (In English).

15. Hogenboom J.A., Pellegrino L., Sandrucci A. Invited review: Hygienic quality, composition, and technological performance of raw milk obtained by robotic milking of cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2019. Vol. 9. 7640-7654 (In English).

16. Jovović V., Pandurević T., Važić B., Erbez M. Microclimate parameters and ventilation inside the barns in the lowland region of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Animal Science of BIH. 2019. Vol. 1. N2. 14-18 (In English).

17. Morozov N.M. Innovatsionnaya tekhnika i tekhnologii v zhivotnovodstve [Innovative techniques and technologies in livestock]. Ekonomika sel`skogo khozyaystva Rossii. 2020. N2. 2-8 (In Russian).

18. Ju C., Son H.I. Modeling and control of heterogeneous agricultural field robots based on Ramadge – Wonham theory. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2019. Vol. 5. N1. 48-55 (In English).

19. Zamriy A.A. Proektirovanie i raschet metodom konechnykh elementov trekhmernykh konstruktsiy v srede APM Structure 3D [Design and calculation by the finite element method of three-dimensional structures in the APM Structure 3D environment]. Moscow: APM. 2006. 288 (In Russian).

20. Mahalakshmi J., Kuppusamy K., Kaleeswari C., Mahes­wari P. IoT Sensor-Based Smart Agricultural System. Emerging Technologies for Agriculture and Environment. Singapore. Springer. 2020. 39-52 (In English).


Review

For citations:


Kirsanov V.V. Structural and Functional Models for Building New Generation Automated and Robotic Dairy Farms. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2022;16(1):4-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2022-16-1-4-9

Views: 532


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7599 (Print)