Trends in the Development of Biotechnical Systems in Animal Husbandry
https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2020-14-3-27-32
Abstract
The concept of biotechnical systems belongs to the class of human-machine systems or human–machine–plant systems, human–machine–animal systems. The latter relate to agriculture and the livestock industry. In agricultural production, biotechnical systems have the properties of bimodality, when there are two or more biological objects, a person as a managing operator and a service object (plants, animals).
(Research purpose) The research purpose is in analyzing trends in the development of biomachine and technical systems in order to further intellectualize and digitalize agricultural production.
(Materials and methods) There are two approaches in the study of human-machine systems: anthropocentric and machine-centric; the first one assigns a crucial role to the person, the second one – to the machine.
(Results and discussion) The article presents the functionality of the Human and Machine subsystems. Part of the functions of the Human operator will gradually be transferred to the Machine, and the Human operator will be transformed into a human Expert and a human User. The article presents a scheme for an intelligent biotechnical system in animal husbandry, and determines the coefficients of adaptation of local automated and robotic biotechnical systems to biological objects. Authors have created a scheme for the functioning of local biotechnical systems in a partially autonomous multi-agent control mode, and identifies criteria for evaluating the functioning of local biotechnical systems.
(Conclusions) We need to strengthen the Machine factor on the basis of developing machine-centric models and convert complex three-tier system of biotech in animal husbandry in two-tier with the polarization of the human Expert, human User and Machine–Animal subsystems. The latter absorbs more and more intelligent functions that are passed by a Man, for which it retained control, coordination and management of the entire system.
About the Authors
V. V. Kirsanov
Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Kirsanov, Dr.Sc.(Eng.), chief researcher
Moscow
Yu. A. Tsoy
Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuriy A. Tsoy, corresponding member of RAS, Dr.Sc.(Eng.), chief researcher
Moscow
References
1. Goryachkin V.P. Zemledel’cheskaya mekhanika CH. 1: Osnovy teorii zemledel’ches kikh mashin i orudiy: 1917-1918 [Agricultural mechanics. Ch. 1: Fundamentals of agricultural machines and tools: 1917-1918]. Moscow: Kn-vo studentov Petrov. s.-kh. akad. 1919. 200 (In Russian).
2. Chernoivanov V.I. Biomashsistemy. Teoriya i prilozheniya [Biomachine systems. Theory and applications]. Moscow: Rosinformagrotekh. 2016. 214 (In Russian).
3. Kartashov L.P., Solov’ev S.A., Asmankin E.N., Makarovskaya Z.V. Raschet ispolnitel’nykh mekhanizmov biotekhnicheskoy sistemy [Calculation of executive mechanisms of a biotechnical system]. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN. 2002. 181 (In Russian).
4. Anokhin P.K. Uzlovye voprosy teorii funktsional’nykh sistem [Nodal issues of the functional system theory]. Moscow: Nauka. 1980. 196 (In Russian).
5. Popechitelev E.P. Problemy sinteza biotekhnicheskikh system [Problems of synthesis of biotechnical systems]. Nauchnoe obozreniye. Tekhnicheskiye nauki. 2016. N2. 54-62 (In Russian).
6. Chernoivanov V.I., Sudakov S.K., Tolokonnikov G.K. Biomashsistemy, funktsional’nye sistemy i kategornaya teoriya sistem [Biomachine, functional systems and categorical systems theory]. Vestnik Vserossiyskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta mekhanizatsii zhivotnovodstva. 2017. N2(26). 23-34 (In Russian).
7. Weibing W. Target Detection And Analysis of Intelligent Agricultural Vehicle Movement Obstacle Based on Panoramic Vision. Inmateh-Agricultural Engineering. 2019. Vol. 58. N3.
8. Arkhipov A.G., Kosogor S.N., Motorin O.A., Gorbachev M.I., Suvorov G.A., Truflyak E.V. TSifrovaya transformatsiya sel’skogo khozyaystva Rossii [Digital transformation of Russian agriculture]. Moscow: Rosinformagrotekh. 2019. 80 (In Russian).
9. Doronin A.M., Romanov D.A., Romanov M.A. Cheloveko-mashinnoe vzaimodeystvie i ego pokazateli [Human-machine interaction and its indicators]. Vestnik Adygeyskogo GU. 2005. N4. 244-250 (In Russian).
10. Raju K. L., Vijayaraghavan V. IoT Technologies in Agricultu ral Environment: A Survey. Wireless Personal Communications. 2020.
11. Petrin K.V., Teryaev R.D., Filimonov A.B., Filimonov N.B. Tekhnologii v ergaticheskikh sistemakh upravleniya [Technologies in ergatic control systems]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo Federal’nogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2010. N3. 7-13 (In Russian).
12. Fisinin V.I., Lachuga Yu.F., Zhuchenko A.A., Ivanov A.L., Ushachev I.G., Ezhevskiy A.A., Krasnoshchekov N.V., Chernoivanov V.I., Izmaylov A.Yu., Strebkov D.S., Popov V.D. Strategiya mashinno-tekhnologicheskoy modernizatsii sel’skogo khozyaystva na period do 2020 goda [Strategy of machine and technological modernization of agriculture up to 2020]. Moscow: Rosinformagrotekh. 2009. 80 (In Russian).
13. Voutos Y. et al. A survey on intelligent agricultural information handling methodologies. Sustainability. 2019. Vol. 11. N12. 3278.
14. Yang H. et al. Experimental analysis and evaluation of wide residual networks based agricultural disease identification in smart agriculture system. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. 2019. Vol. 2019. N1. 1-10.
15. Mylostyvyi R.V. et al. Ecological substantiation of the normalization of the state of the air environment in the uninsulated barn in the hot period. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 2019. Vol. 9. N3. 84-91.
16. Jovović V. et al. Microclimate parameters and ventilation inside the barns in the lowland region of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Animal Science of bih. 2019. Vol. 1. N2. 14-18.
17. Salimi M., Pourdarbani R., Nouri B. A. Factors Affecting the Adoption of Agricultural Automation Using Davis’s Acceptance Model (Case Study: Ardabil). Acta Technologica Agriculturae. 2020. Vol. 23. N1. 30-39.
18. Mahalakshmi J. et al. IoT Sensor-Based Smart Agricultural System. Emerging Technologies for Agriculture and Environment. Springer. Singapore. 2020. 39-52.
19. Ju C., Son H. I. Modeling and control of heterogeneous agricultural field robots based on Ramadge–Wonham theory. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2019. Vol. 5. N1. 48-55.
20. Dozortsev V.M. Zametki o mode i cheloveke v promyshlennoy avtomatizatsii [Notes on fashion and man in industrial automation]. Avtomatizatsiya v promyshlennosti. 2011. N2. 32-34 (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Kirsanov V.V., Tsoy Yu.A. Trends in the Development of Biotechnical Systems in Animal Husbandry. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2020;14(3):27-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2020-14-3-27-32
Views:
905
Email this article 