Engineering and Environmental Support for Weed Control
https://doi.org/10.22314/20737599-2019-13-3-18-23
Abstract
Better fi eld operations are performed result in lower weed contamination of crops, which means less chemical protection is required. This makes a positive eff ect on soil fertility, crop quality and the ecological situation in general. (Research purpose) To study weed circulation in mechanized farm technologies for cereal production and propose ways of reducing the weed content at all stages of cultivation, taking into account the favorable environmental response of the agricultural background. (Materials and methods) The authors have revealed the fundamental criteria for the implementation of fi eld operations based on a multifactorial model of crop cultivation: reduction of the weed content, reduction of soil compaction sites and re-processing, and environmenta response. They have demonstrated weed circulation in traditional cereal production technologies, identifi ed the development dynamics of weeds and their distribution in the agricultural background. (Results and discussion) The authors controlled weed seeds on spring wheat fi elds under production conditions during the harvest seasons of 2016 and 2017. They experimentally found an increased content of miliary weed seeds in the selected threshing products, the mass of which ranged from 5 to 16 grams per m2. The share of weed seeds in grain hopper amounted to 2.9 percent. It was revealed that weed seeds isolated by a combine remain viable after autumn tillage. Transverse tillage increases the area of contamination in 2 times or more. The authors propose a comprehensive system of weed control at all stages of fi eld operations, taking into account the environmental response of the agricultural background. It is shown that the separation and destruction of weed seeds at the harvest stage is of particular importance. The authors present technical and technological solutions to reduce weeds and ensure a favorable ecological situation. (Conclusions) The authors have designed a comprehensive system to reduce weed contamination, thus reducing the overall impact of plant protection remedies by 30 percent.
About the Authors
A. V. ShindelovRussian Federation
Andrey V. Shindelov, Ph.D.(Eng.), associate professor
Novosibirsk
N. M. Ivanov
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Ivanov, Dr.Sc.(Eng.), professor
Krasnoobsk, Novosibirsk Region
References
1. Ivanov N.M., Chepurin G.E. Nauchno-tekhnicheskoye obespecheniye agrarnogo kompleksa Sibiri [Scientific and technical support of the farm industry of Siberia]. Sibirskiy vestnik sel'skokhozyaystvennoy nauki. 2014. N5. 93-100 (In Russian).
2. Shindelov A.V., Korobova L.N., Tanatova A.V., Ferapontova S.A. Nauchno-metodicheskiye rekomendatsii po ispol'zovaniyu mikrobiologicheskikh pokazateley dlya otsenki sostoyaniya pakhotnykh pochv Sibiri [Scientific and methodological recommendations on the use of microbiological indicators for assessing the condition of arable soil in Siberia]. Novosibirsk: VPO NGAU. 2013. 37 (In Russian).
3. Litvishko V.S. Ekologizatsiya sredstv zashchity rasteniy [Ecologization of plant protection products]. Yestestvennye i tekhnicheskiye nauki. 2018. N2(116). 53-54 (In Russian).
4. Ivanov N.M., Kolinko V.P., Kudashkin P.I., Golikov V.R. Pochvoobrabatyvayushchiye mashiny dlya bor'by s sornoy rastitel'nost'yu [Tillage machines for weed control]. Sel'skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii. 2013. Vol. 7. N2. 24-26 (In Russian).
5. Shindelov A.V., Korobova L.N., Shindelov A.V., Tanatova A.V. Modeli marshrutizatsii i navigatsiya opryskivayushchey tekhniki kak faktor korregirovaniya biologicheskikh svoystv pochvy [Routing models and spray navigation techniques as a factor of correcting the biological soil properties]. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2015. N5(127). 65-70 (In Russian).
6. Ivanov N.M., Dokin B.D., Elkin O.V., Chekusov M.S. Al'ternativnye varianty tekhnologiy i tekhnicheskikh sredstv dlya proizvodstva zerna v usloviyakh Sibiri [Alternative technologies and technical means for grain production in Siberia]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki v APK. 2015. N1. 49-51 (In Russian).
7. Terpigorev A.A., Gzhibovskiy S.A., Grushin A.V. Tekhnologii i tekhnicheskiye sredstva dlya zashchity rasteniy v termicheski napryazhennyye periody [Technologies and technical means for plant protection in thermally intense periods]. Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2017. Vol. 51. 327-332 (In Russian).
8. Ivanov N.M., Chepurin G.E. Obosnovaniye razrabotki tekhnologicheskogo pasporta zernouborochnykh kombaynov [Grounds for the development of technological passport for combine harvesters]. Sel'skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii 2016. Vol. 10. N4. 25-31 (In Russian).
9. Shindelov A.V. K modelirovaniyu optimal'nykh trayektoriy dvizheniya polevoy mashiny [Modeling the optimal trajecto ries of the field machine movement]. Sibirskiy vestnik sel'skokhozyaystvennoy nauki. 2009. N11. 98-106 (In Russian).
10. Abdulgalimov M.M., Magomedov F.M., Sen'kevich S.Ye., Umarov R.D., Melikov I.M. Sovershenstvovaniye tekhnologii i sredstv mekhanizatsii dlya bor'by s sornoy rastitel'nost'yu [Improvement of technology and mechanization means for weed control]. Sel'skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii. 2017. Vol. 11. N5. 38-42 (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Shindelov A.V., Ivanov N.M. Engineering and Environmental Support for Weed Control. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2019;13(3):18-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22314/20737599-2019-13-3-18-23