Preview

Agricultural Machinery and Technologies

Advanced search

Use of Biochar-peat Mixture to Reduce Odour from Animal Farms

https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2018-13-2-27-30

Abstract

Abstract. Odour from agriculture causes local nuisance to the neighborhood. Litter and cover materials can be used in animal housing and in storage of manure to reduce the odour problem. The use of biochar as a covering for animal manures is a new innovation and enhances the possibility to minimize the emissions from animal farms. (Research purpose) To study the possibility of using a mixture of biochar and peat as a manure covering, in order to reduce the intensity of odor on livestock farms. (Materials and methods) The potential of a mixture of biochar and peat for the odour control was tested in a laboratory study. A 10 cm layer of fresh mink manure was placed on the bottom of a 5 liter test bucket and the manure was covered with biochar-peat mixture (mixed in 50/50 ratio by volume) using five different covering thicknesses. Uncovered manure was used as a reference. The odour emission was measured with an olfactometric method that is based on odour sensation of a person. Also the character of the odour was described. (Results and discussion) The results show that a biochar-peat covering of at least 3 cm is able to considerably reduce the odour from the manure. The character of the odour was at first peat-like for all covered buckets but with thin coverings it was changed to more manure-like after 2 days. The odour from buckets with thicker covers remained peat-like during the whole testing period. (Conclusion) It is recommended to apply a biochar-peat covering to neutralize ammonia and the unpleasant manure odour on livestock farms. The author has shown that the frequency of use and the thickness of a covering layer depend on the ambient temperature; therefore, it is not necessary to cover manure in winter.

About the Author

Maarit Hellstedt
Natural Resources Institute (Luke)
Finland


References

1. Lyngbye M., Hansen M.J., Riis A.L., Jensen T.L., and Sørensen G. 1000 Olfactometry Analyses and 100 TD-GC/ MS Analyses to Evaluate Methods for Reducing Odour from Finishing Units in Denmark. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Agricultural Air Quality. Washington, DC, USA. June 5-8. 2006. 138-152 (In English).

2. Hörnig G., Turk M., Wanka U. Slurry Covers to Reduce Ammonia Emission and Odour Nuisance. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 1999. Vol. 73. 151-157 (In English).

3. Guarino M., Fabbri C., Brambilla M., Valli L., Navarotto P. Evaluation of simplified covering systems to reduce gaseous emissions from livestock manure storage. Transactions of the ASABE. 2006. 49(3). 737-747 (In English).

4. Karlsson S. Measures to Reduce Ammonia Losses from Storage Containers for Liquid Manure. In: Proceedings of AgEng-96, Madrid, 23.-26. September 1996. Paper 96E-013 (In English).

5. Arnold M., Kuusisto S., Wellman K., Kajolinna T., Räsänen J., Sipilä J., Puumala M., Sorvala S., Pietarila H., Puputti K. Hajuhaitan vähentäminen maatalouden suurissa eläintuotantoyksiköissä [Reducing the odour annoyance from large animal production units]. VTT tiedotteita. 2006. Research Notes 2323. 74. (In Finnish).

6. Kapuinen P., Karhunen J. EPS-rakeet ja EPS-rouhe sikalan lietesäiliön katteena [EPS-granules and EPS-groats as coverings of slurry tanks in piggeries]. VAKOLAn tiedote 72. 1996. Vihti (In Finnish).

7. Taghizadeh-Toosi A., Clough T.J., Sherlock R.R., Condrol M.L. A wood based low-temperature biochar captures NH3-N generated from ruminant urine-N, retaining its bioavailability. Plant and Soil. 2012. 353. 73-84 (In English).

8. Tiilikkala K., Holstila T., Rasa K. Testaus hitaan pyrolyysin soveltuvuudesta bio-massojen prosessointiin uusiksi tuotteiksi ja energiaksi. Loppuraportti [Testing the suitability of pyrolysis to process biobased materials into new products and energy. Final report]. 2013. http://www.fskk.fi/index.php?section=126 (In Finnish).

9. Arnold M. Hajuohjearvojen perusteet [The line of argumentation for quide values of odour]. VTT Tiedotteita. Research Notes 1711. Espoo: VTT. 1995. 83. 14 (In Finnish).

10. McGinley M.A., McGinley C.M. Developing a Credible Odor Monitoring Program. In Proceedings American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). Annual Conference Ottawa, ON, Canada: 1-4 August 2004 (In English).

11. McGinley M.A., McGinley C.M. Comparison of Field Olfactometers in a Controlled Chamber using Hydrogen Sulfide as the Test Odorant. In Proceedigs International Water Association 2nd International Conference on Odour and VOCs. Singapore: 14-17 September 2003 (In English).

12. Benzo M., Mantovani A., Pittarello A. Measurement of Odour Concentration of Immissions using a New Field Olfactometer and Markers’ Chemical Analysis. Chemical engineering transactions. 2012. Vol. 30. 103-108. DOI:10.3303/CET1230018 (In English).

13. Nørregaard Hansen M. Quantification of odour emission from mink housing units. Test report. AgroTech. 2015. 36 (In English).

14. Hellstedt M., Regina K. The effect of biochar-peat mixture on the gaseous emissions from fur animal manure. In: Proceedings of the XIth international scientific congress in fur animal production, Helsinki, Finland. August 23 to 26, 2016 / Eds. A. Mäki-Tanila, J. Valaja, J. Mononen, T. Sironen and O. Vapalahti. Scientifur 40 ¾. 2016. 247-251 (In English).


Review

For citations:


Hellstedt M. Use of Biochar-peat Mixture to Reduce Odour from Animal Farms. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2019;13(2):27-30. https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2018-13-2-27-30

Views: 927


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7599 (Print)