OVERLAID CHISEL BLADE LOCATION RELATIVE TO DIRECTION OF PLOWING UNIT MOVEMENT
https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2017-6-22-27
Abstract
An overlaid chisel of a compound ploughshare is the most loaded part which is important for operability of a ploughshare and implementation of agrotechnical requirements for plowing depth. Chisels of ploughshares are made by methods of stamping and blanking with use of gas, laser or plasma machines. Parts from a rolled strip are the most wearresisting. Сhisels with big difference on plowing depth between extreme points of an edge are the best for heavy soils cultivation because of partial destruction of the soil bottom layer. When light and medium soils plowing the difference of depth between extreme points of an edge of a chisel is reduced for decrease in traction resistance of a ploughshare. On light soils with the hardness up to 2.7 MPa the plows equipped with ploughshares with the chisels having the minimum difference on depth between extreme points of an edge have the minimum traction resistance. When difference raises up to 30 mm traction resistance increases on average for 5.5 percent. This dependence is close to linear if difference of depth varies from 10 to 30 mm. The overlaid chisels are recommended for ploughshares at cultivation of light and heavy soils by plows of general purpose. The angle between a chisel edge and a furrow wall should to be direct, and the difference of depth between extreme points on the line crossing an edge and sides of the chisel should be in an interval of 15-20 mm.
About the Authors
I. V. LiskinRussian Federation
1st Institutskiy proezd, 5, Moscow, 109428, Russian Federation
D. A. Mironov
Russian Federation
1st Institutskiy proezd, 5, Moscow, 109428, Russian Federation
R. K. Kurbanov
Russian Federation
Ph.D.
1st Institutskiy proezd, 5, Moscow, 109428, Russian Federation
References
1. Liskin I.V., Mironov D.A., Sidorov S.A. Plow balance in the longitudinally vertical plane. Sel’skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii. 2014; 6: 41-46. (In Russian)
2. Lobachevskiy Ya.P., Liskin I.V., Sidorov S.A., Mironov D.A., Kurbanov R.K. Working out and production tech ni que of soil cultivating working tools. Sel’skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii. 2016; 4: 3-8. (In Russian)
3. Liskin I.V., Mironov D.A., Mironova A.V., Kurbanov R.K. New ploughshare with the overlaid chisel. Sel’skiy mekhanizator. 2016; 2: 6-7. (In Russian)
4. Bernshteyn D.B., Liskin I.V. Ploughshares. Analysis of designs, conditions of wear and applied materials. Traktory i sel’khozmashiny. 1992; 4: 35-38. (In Russian)
5. Mironov D.A. Analysis of design factors of plow ploughshares for a soil cultivating. Sel’skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii. 2013; 4: 48. (In Russian).
6. Liskin I. V., Mironov D. A. Influence of soil conditions on wear of working tools. Sel’skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii. 2013; 5: 29-31. (In Russian)
7. Zhuk A.F. Influence of soil build-up on wedge work. Sel’skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii. 2013; 3: 24-29. (In Russian)
8. Lobachevskiy Ya.P., Starovoytov S.I., Chemisov N.N. Power and technological evaluation of soil cultivating working tool. Sel’skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii. 2015; 5: 10-13. (In Russian)
9. Lobachevskiy Ya.P., Starovoytov S.I. Horizontal compo nent of traction resistance of plow base. Intellektual’nye mashinnye tekhnologii i tekhnika dlya realizatsii Gosu darstvennoy programmy razvitiya sel’skogo khozyaystva: Sbornik nauchnykh dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-tekhnicheskoy konferentsii. Moscow: VIM, 2015: 189-194. (In Russian)
10. Liskin I.V., Mironov D.A., Sidorov S.A., Ternovskiy A.A., Vereshchaga I.N. Ob osobennostyakh raboty i iz-nashivaniya pluzhnykh lemekhov s nakladnym dolotom [About features of work and wear of plow ploughshares with bolt-on tine]. Intellektual’nye mashiny tekhnologii i tekhnika dlya realizatsii gosudarstvennoy programmy razvitiya sel’skogo khozyaystva: Sb. dokl. Mezhdunar. nauch.-tekhn. konf. Vol.1. Moscow: VIM, 2015: 80-85. (In Russian)
11. Liskin I.V., Mironov D.A., Sidorov S.A., Potkin S.N., Eremin P.A. Ustification and working out of new plow ploughshare of VIM design. Innovatsionnoe razvitie APK Rossii na baze intellektual’nykh mashinnykh tekhnologiy: Sbornik nauchnykh dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnotekhnicheskoy konferentsii. Moscow: VIM, 2014: 101-104. (In Russian)
12. Zhalnin E.V. Agricultural mechanics at the beginning of the XXI century. Sel’skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii. 2009; 6: 43-47. (In Russian)
13. Izmailov A.Yu., Liskin I.V., Lobachevsky Ya.P., Sido rov S.A., Khoroshenkov V.K., Mironova A.V., Luzhnova E.S. Simulation of soil-cutting blade wear in an artificial abrasive environment based on the similarity theory. Russian Agricultural Sciences. 2017. V. 43. 1: 71-74. (In Russian)
14. Sineokov G.N., Panov I.M. Teoriya i raschet pochvoobrabatyvayushchikh mashin [Theory and design of soil-cultivating machines]. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1977: 328. (In Russian)
15. Mehari Z., Randy L., Ernest W., Thomas R. Effect of Soil Moisture, Soil Density, and Cone Penetrometer Material on Finite Element Prediction of Soil Hardpan Depth // Written for presentationat the 2005 ASAE Annual international Meeting Sponsored by ASAE Tampa Conventio Center Nampa, Florida. 2005: 1012-1024. (In English)
16. Hettiaratchi D.R.P. The Soil Contract Zones of Concave Agricultural Discs: Part 2. Calculation Procedures // Department of Agricultural and Environmental science, The University of Newcasile upon Tyne, Newcasile upon Tyne, NEI ZRu, UK. 1997: 811-814. (In English)
Review
For citations:
Liskin I.V., Mironov D.A., Kurbanov R.K. OVERLAID CHISEL BLADE LOCATION RELATIVE TO DIRECTION OF PLOWING UNIT MOVEMENT. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2017;(6):22-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22314/2073-7599-2017-6-22-27