Preview

Agricultural Machinery and Technologies

Advanced search

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES USE IN RUSSIA

Abstract

Technical efficiency of agricultural resources use in Russia is assessed. As methodology for calculations the author used Data envelopment analysis (DEA) which is the nonparametric method based on linear programming. The essence of the DEA method consists in an efficiency evaluation of homogeneous units of decision making proceeding from creation on the basis of real data (amounts of resources and amounts of types of output) of general border of production capabilities. CCR-I model was offerd as a specific kind of the DEA model. It is the radial DEA model with continual returns to scale and orientation to resources. The group of 54 countries included in a research consisted of the states of the CIS, BRIC, the EU, OECD. The time frames of calculation were established: 1992-2007 and 2008-2012 (owing to lack of uniform data for all time interval). Аmount of agricultural products was used as output. Agricultural lands, an economically active population in agriculture, farm machines and the equipment, a livestock, fertilizers were used in the form of resources. The main source of statistical data is FAOSTAT. From 54 countries under consideration Belgium, Greece, Israel, Malta and the Netherlands became leaders in technical efficiency of agricultural industry in 1992-2007. Inefficient use of agricultural resources, especially lands was established as a result of the conducted research in Russia. On average efficiency of use of agricultural lands in our country can be increased by 8 times, work - by 2-2.5 times, machines - by 2-3 times, a livestock and fertilizers - by 1.5-2 times. Good tendencies to growth of efficiency of agricultural production are notice in 2008-2012.

About the Author

V. M. Korotchenya
Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM
Russian Federation


References

1. Коротченя В.М. Интегральная оценка эффективности машиннотракторного парка сельского хозяйства // Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии. 2015. N6. С. 46-50

2. Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Handbook on data envelopment analysis. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Springer, 2011: 497

3. Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Tone K. Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEASolver software. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2007: 490

4. Ray S.C. Data envelopment analysis: Theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 353

5. Emrouznejad A., Parker B.R., Tavares G. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA SocioEconomic Planning Sciences. 2008. Vol. 42; 3: 151-157

6. Latruffe L., Desjeux Y. Common Agricultural Policy support, technical efficiency and productivity change in French agriculture. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies. 2016. Vol. 97; 1: 15-28

7. Manjunatha A.V., Speelman S., Aravindakshan S., Babu A.T.S., Mal P. Impact of informal groundwater markets on efficiency of irrigated farms in India: A bootstrap data envelopment analysis approach. Irrigation Science. 2016. Vol. 34; 1: 41-52

8. Slade P., Hailu G. Efficiency and regulation: A comparison of dairy farms in Ontario and New York State. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2016. Vol. 45;1: 103-115

9. Urdiales M.P., Lansink A.O., Wall A. Ecoefficiency among dairy farmers: The importance of socioeconomic characteristics and farmer attitudes. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2016. Vol. 64; 4: 559-574

10. Poudel K.L., Johnson T.G., Yamamoto N., Gautam S., Mishra B. Comparing technical efficiency of organic and conventional coffee farms in rural hill region of Nepal using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Organic Agriculture. 2015. Vol. 5; 4: 263-275

11. Vlontzos G., Niavis S. Assessing the evolution of technical efficiency of agriculture in EU countries: Is there a role for the agenda 2000? Agricultural cooperative management and policy: New robust, reliable and coherent modelling tools. ed. by C. Zopounidis, N. Kalogeras, K. Mattas, G. van Dijk, G. Baourakis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014: 339-351

12. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978. Vol. 2; 6: 429-444

13. Coelli T.J., Rao D.S.P. Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 19802000. Agricultural Economics. 2005. Vol. 32; 1: 115-134

14. Жалнин Э.В. К дискуссии о методике оценки экономической эффективности сельскохозяйственной техники // Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии. 2013. N3. С. 3-9

15. Сорокин Н.Т., Табашников А.Т. Методика оценки экономической эффективности сельскохозяйственной техники // Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии. 2015. N2. С. 41-44


Review

For citations:


Korotchenya V.M. TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES USE IN RUSSIA. Agricultural Machinery and Technologies. 2016;(6):33-39. (In Russ.)

Views: 619


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7599 (Print)