<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vimjour</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Agricultural Machinery and Technologies</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2073-7599</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vimjour-169</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>НОВЫЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ И ОБОРУДОВАНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>NEW TECHNICS AND TECHNOLOGOES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ТЕХНИЧЕСКАЯ ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫХ РЕСУРСОВ В РОССИИ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES USE IN RUSSIA</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коротченя</surname><given-names>В. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Korotchenya</surname><given-names>V. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Федеральный научный агроинженерный центр ВИМ</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>12</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Коротченя В.М., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Коротченя В.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Korotchenya V.M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vimsmit.com/jour/article/view/169">https://www.vimsmit.com/jour/article/view/169</self-uri><abstract><p>Дана оценка технической эффективности использования сельскохозяйственных ресурсов в России. В качестве методологии для расчетов использовали Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - непараметрический метод, основанный на линейном программировании. Показали, что суть метода DEA состоит в оценке эффективности гомогенных единиц принятия решений исходя из построения на основе реальных данных (объемов ресурсов и объемов видов выпуска) общей границы производственных возможностей. В качестве конкретной разновидности модели DEA предложили так называемую CCR-I модель, то есть радиальную модель DEA с постоянной отдачей от масштаба и ориентацией на ресурсы. Группа включенных в исследование 54 стран состояла из государств СНГ, БРИК, ЕС, ОЭСР. Установили временные интервалы расчета: 1992-2007 гг. и 2008-2012 гг. (в силу отсутствия единообразных данных за весь временной промежуток). В качестве выпуска использовали объем сельскохозяйственной продукции. Сельскохозяйственные угодья, экономически активное население в области сельского хозяйства, сельскохозяйственные машины и оборудование, домашний скот, удобрения использовались в виде ресурсов. Основной источник статистических данных - FAOSTAT. Из 54 рассматриваемых стран лидерами по технической эффективности сельского хозяйства в 1992-2007 гг. стали Бельгия, Греция, Израиль, Мальта и Нидерланды. В результате проведенного исследования установили неэффективное использование в России сельскохозяйственных ресурсов, особенно земли. Расчеты показали, что в среднем эффективность использования сельскохозяйственных угодий в нашей стране можно повысить в 8 раз, труда - в 2-2,5 раза, машин - в 2-3 раза, домашнего скота и удобрений - в 1,5-2 раза. Установлено, что в 2008-2012 гг. наметились хорошие тенденции к росту эффективности сельскохозяйственного производства.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Technical efficiency of agricultural resources use in Russia is assessed. As methodology for calculations the author used Data envelopment analysis (DEA) which is the nonparametric method based on linear programming. The essence of the DEA method consists in an efficiency evaluation of homogeneous units of decision making proceeding from creation on the basis of real data (amounts of resources and amounts of types of output) of general border of production capabilities. CCR-I model was offerd as a specific kind of the DEA model. It is the radial DEA model with continual returns to scale and orientation to resources. The group of 54 countries included in a research consisted of the states of the CIS, BRIC, the EU, OECD. The time frames of calculation were established: 1992-2007 and 2008-2012 (owing to lack of uniform data for all time interval). Аmount of agricultural products was used as output. Agricultural lands, an economically active population in agriculture, farm machines and the equipment, a livestock, fertilizers were used in the form of resources. The main source of statistical data is FAOSTAT. From 54 countries under consideration Belgium, Greece, Israel, Malta and the Netherlands became leaders in technical efficiency of agricultural industry in 1992-2007. Inefficient use of agricultural resources, especially lands was established as a result of the conducted research in Russia. On average efficiency of use of agricultural lands in our country can be increased by 8 times, work - by 2-2.5 times, machines - by 2-3 times, a livestock and fertilizers - by 1.5-2 times. Good tendencies to growth of efficiency of agricultural production are notice in 2008-2012.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>data envelopment analysis (DEA)</kwd><kwd>техническая эффективность</kwd><kwd>сельское хозяйство</kwd><kwd>сельскохозяйственные ресурсы</kwd><kwd>Data envelopment analysis (DEA)</kwd><kwd>Technical efficiency</kwd><kwd>Agricultural industry</kwd><kwd>Agricultural resources</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Коротченя В.М. Интегральная оценка эффективности машиннотракторного парка сельского хозяйства // Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии. 2015. N6. С. 46-50</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Коротченя В.М. Интегральная оценка эффективности машиннотракторного парка сельского хозяйства // Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии. 2015. N6. С. 46-50</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Handbook on data envelopment analysis. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Springer, 2011: 497</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Handbook on data envelopment analysis. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Springer, 2011: 497</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Tone K. Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEASolver software. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2007: 490</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Tone K. Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEASolver software. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2007: 490</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ray S.C. Data envelopment analysis: Theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 353</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ray S.C. Data envelopment analysis: Theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 353</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Emrouznejad A., Parker B.R., Tavares G. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA SocioEconomic Planning Sciences. 2008. Vol. 42; 3: 151-157</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Emrouznejad A., Parker B.R., Tavares G. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA SocioEconomic Planning Sciences. 2008. Vol. 42; 3: 151-157</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Latruffe L., Desjeux Y. Common Agricultural Policy support, technical efficiency and productivity change in French agriculture. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies. 2016. Vol. 97; 1: 15-28</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Latruffe L., Desjeux Y. Common Agricultural Policy support, technical efficiency and productivity change in French agriculture. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies. 2016. Vol. 97; 1: 15-28</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Manjunatha A.V., Speelman S., Aravindakshan S., Babu A.T.S., Mal P. Impact of informal groundwater markets on efficiency of irrigated farms in India: A bootstrap data envelopment analysis approach. Irrigation Science. 2016. Vol. 34; 1: 41-52</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Manjunatha A.V., Speelman S., Aravindakshan S., Babu A.T.S., Mal P. Impact of informal groundwater markets on efficiency of irrigated farms in India: A bootstrap data envelopment analysis approach. Irrigation Science. 2016. Vol. 34; 1: 41-52</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Slade P., Hailu G. Efficiency and regulation: A comparison of dairy farms in Ontario and New York State. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2016. Vol. 45;1: 103-115</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Slade P., Hailu G. Efficiency and regulation: A comparison of dairy farms in Ontario and New York State. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2016. Vol. 45;1: 103-115</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Urdiales M.P., Lansink A.O., Wall A. Ecoefficiency among dairy farmers: The importance of socioeconomic characteristics and farmer attitudes. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2016. Vol. 64; 4: 559-574</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Urdiales M.P., Lansink A.O., Wall A. Ecoefficiency among dairy farmers: The importance of socioeconomic characteristics and farmer attitudes. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2016. Vol. 64; 4: 559-574</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Poudel K.L., Johnson T.G., Yamamoto N., Gautam S., Mishra B. Comparing technical efficiency of organic and conventional coffee farms in rural hill region of Nepal using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Organic Agriculture. 2015. Vol. 5; 4: 263-275</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Poudel K.L., Johnson T.G., Yamamoto N., Gautam S., Mishra B. Comparing technical efficiency of organic and conventional coffee farms in rural hill region of Nepal using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Organic Agriculture. 2015. Vol. 5; 4: 263-275</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vlontzos G., Niavis S. Assessing the evolution of technical efficiency of agriculture in EU countries: Is there a role for the agenda 2000? Agricultural cooperative management and policy: New robust, reliable and coherent modelling tools. ed. by C. Zopounidis, N. Kalogeras, K. Mattas, G. van Dijk, G. Baourakis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014: 339-351</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vlontzos G., Niavis S. Assessing the evolution of technical efficiency of agriculture in EU countries: Is there a role for the agenda 2000? Agricultural cooperative management and policy: New robust, reliable and coherent modelling tools. ed. by C. Zopounidis, N. Kalogeras, K. Mattas, G. van Dijk, G. Baourakis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014: 339-351</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978. Vol. 2; 6: 429-444</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978. Vol. 2; 6: 429-444</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coelli T.J., Rao D.S.P. Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 19802000. Agricultural Economics. 2005. Vol. 32; 1: 115-134</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coelli T.J., Rao D.S.P. Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 19802000. Agricultural Economics. 2005. Vol. 32; 1: 115-134</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жалнин Э.В. К дискуссии о методике оценки экономической эффективности сельскохозяйственной техники // Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии. 2013. N3. С. 3-9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Жалнин Э.В. К дискуссии о методике оценки экономической эффективности сельскохозяйственной техники // Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии. 2013. N3. С. 3-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сорокин Н.Т., Табашников А.Т. Методика оценки экономической эффективности сельскохозяйственной техники // Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии. 2015. N2. С. 41-44</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Сорокин Н.Т., Табашников А.Т. Методика оценки экономической эффективности сельскохозяйственной техники // Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии. 2015. N2. С. 41-44</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
